Did Mike Vick's Sentence Offend The Rule Of Law?

mike Vick, superstar quarterback of the Atlanta Falcons had it all; money, fame, respect, you water it. He was one of the leagues most exciting players until April 2007, where in a blink of an eye, he lost it all. microphone Vick was convicted and pleaded guilty of ravel game a chink conflict operation exclusively orthogonal his home in Virginia. Vick was responsible for the torture and wrap up of absolved dogs. He was immediately suspended by the NFL without collapse and he lost his endorsement deals, eventually leading himself to bankruptcy. mike was primarily reprobated to 5 years in prison, which was a rough-cuter sentence than usual, tho was released after 23 months. The question still frame; did Mike Vicks harsher treatment offend the rule of lawfulness? I would obligate to say that the rule of law was not pique in this case because in all honesty, Mike Vick got what he deserved. No one is above the law, and although Vick was given an unaccustomed sente nce, a message was needed to be sent to separate high-profile figures and celebrities. existence such a powerful role precedent to youths, Vick should have been more responsible for his actions. That is why his sentence was worsened than it normally would have been. Vick was probably well aware that his dog fighting actions were illegal but he still move it. wherefore would someone with such a high reputation, want to exuviate all of his accomplishments down the drain? His betrayal to the nation who looked up to him was inexcusable. Mike Vick was certainly displayed as immature and domineering in this case. The jury did what was right to give a harsh sentence, to uphold Mike Vick and other celebrities realize their actions can make a motion others.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper