Bowl Championship Series

The leaning border the Bowl disdain Series (BCS) in college footb entirely game has many competing factions. There argon those who believe that BCS calculatorized ranking organisation offers the much or less objective option establish on the available statistics for each police squad. Opponents to the BCS argue that the computers system unfairly weighs sealed factors in determining the rankings. No calculate where you stand, arguments for any side of the case raise be convincingly made.With this research, my goal initiate out be to show how despite the controversy of the ranking system, it appears that the main purpose of the BCS system is to bear as much funds as possible through the televising and sponsorship of the field games themselves which create millions of dollars through advertising revenue. jibe to their own website, the BCS is designed to match the twain top-rated squads in a national backing game and to create exciting and competitory matchups betwe en eight another(prenominal) exceedingly regarded teams (The BCS).The key words here argon, in my opinion, exciting and highly regarded. In other words, the BCS wants teams that translate well to the television set imputable to their popularity and due to the likelihood of creating a high-profile matchup that testament draw in millions of viewers as opposed to determining the football programs that deserve to be there based on their play throughout the season. This is understandable from a business point of view, b arly troubling on the other cash in ones chips for two major reasons considering the staggering pecuniary numbers.With their new four- socio-economic class deal with bedevil, the BCS is going to rip in $132 million dollars a year to broadcast the four BCS games, or in other words, $33 million a game (Ourand). The first reason is because these argon student-athletes that do not reap the monetary rewards that the sponsors and colleges are receiving from their lab or. Surely these student-athletes do get special treatment and most of them are on scholarship trying to make it into professional football and the increased media ikon can up their stock, but these benefits color in comparison to the financial windfalls reaped by the colleges and sponsors.The second problem is that this system creates a cycle where high-profile football conferences maintain their ascendancy due to the disproportionate amount of bullion they receive from profiting from the BCS system, which in turn offers these conferences much money to pour into scholarships to attract the outflank athletes (who pay back seen these teams on TV and realize and want to then play for them), more money to spend on meliorate facilities and training programs, and more money to rock-steady additional television broadcasting rights.According to ESPNs college football expert Gregg Easterbrook, every team in the six football milling machinery conferences stands to make $1. 5 milli on dollars from their BCS television profit sharing strategy. Meanwhile teams from the mid-major conferences will only bring in $200,000 if they are fortunate enough to even have a team earn their counsel into the BCS (Eastbrook).BCS proponents cite these figures to strengthen their argument by saying that the profit-sharing strategy effectively lifts all boats when in reality the exciting and highly regarded programs and the BCS sponsors profit disproportionately at the exist of creating a structure that truly has the student-athletes well-being in mind on with actually determining the best team in the land. Works Cited Eastbrook, Gregg.The BCS doesnt incessantly give us a illuminate national champand thats OK. ESPN. 4 December 2007. http//sports. espn. go. com/espn/page2/story? page. The BCS is Bowl Championship Series in association with Fox Sports. 15 August 2007. http//www. bcsfootball. org/bcsfb/definition. Ourand, John and Michael Smith. BCS seeks walloping bump from F ox. Sports Business Journal. 3 November 2008. http//www. sportsbusinessjournal. com/ hold/60463.