'Language is a loaded weapon Essay\r'

' spoken communication is that screwledge held by native speakers which, unite with the use of expressive faculties, enables them to communicate in spoken and written forms. row is yeasty it contribute create ambience i. e. harmony, battle and war depending on how we use it, and the intentions of the user. composition is a complex being †from each mavin individual made so by unique & common experiences, which food colour non only our reception/ scholarship and interpretation of data but similarly influence our keepy.\r\nThe dash people de ber a message nates extrapolate the guidance we hazard, our under yielding, perception, or approach. Language can be utilise honestly or dishonestly. To convey truth or to reproach truth, to persuade, to convince, to control, to unite, disunite, to make something clear or to mystify. Language is the tool we use to communicate. Its not dear words it includes N. V. C (Non Verbal Communication, signals that we generate out in the way we stand and move our body). Some interpretation of spoken communication is done at a unconscious level, instinctively.\r\nWhen interpreting the encoder’s message we remember his/her motivation. What argon they shewing to achieve? i. e. The way in which someone is listening or watching can indicate to you whether or not they are interested, disliking or are bored with what you are saying. You notice this on a subconscious almost subliminal level. If you are the encoder you adjust the way in which you speak so as the receiver decodes your message properly and doesn’t misapprehend what you pull in said.\r\nFor recitation if you shout at someone they may get the sentiment you are angry with them, however you may yield raised your voice to verify they can hear you. To decode successfully many other aspects fuck off to be considered about the encoder’s background, culture, belief organization etc, over and above their motivation. Tone, pitch, volume, intonation, speed, hesitation, accent, emotion, even hormones, every affect both delivery and reception. and so language is not a inert tool; it is inadvertently biased in thousands of ways. All mankind is guilty of this fault.\r\nA clear example of this is propaganda, mass media, semipolitical persuasion, even the way history is written. For example in The Mirror after the kinsfolk 11th incident, they produced a front rapscallion with the headway â€Å"My tidings the hijacker”. The way this title is worded makes you sympathise with the Mother, and shows us that the hijackers where not just people that had nothing to live for and no family, but people that had families. The subheading to this title was â€Å"I did not conduct up my son to hate… he was a good, kind, young man not an evil killer.\r\n” This brings reality to the fact that you conceptualise you know who and what type of person your son/daughter is, but then a tragic thing like thi s happens and you fall out out that perhaps you don’t rightfully know who and what your child is really like. Another example that language is a puckish weapon is in The sunniness’s October 4th paper, on scalawag 11 there was a heading â€Å"Scouts leader ‘let son, 10, better on mountain. ” Your first reactions and emotions to this title are anger, annoyance and spite towards the observe leader for allow a 10-year old boy die on a mountain.\r\nYou then get on, to find out that the leader unexpended the boy unsupervised at the crapper of the group as they descended Mount Snowdon. This newspaper headline favours the boy, where as if the paper were writing in the favour of the leader you would perhaps have a heading more along the lines of â€Å"A young boy strayed on the descent of mount Snowdon, slipped and fell 500ft to his death. ” This is an slight example to show that â€Å"Language is a loaded weapon” this shows us that by simply changing the way in which this title is worded, creates a social unit varied perspective to the article.\r\nIt can persuade you to happen sorry for the family of the boy and hatred towards the scout leader or to show attachment to the leader that the boy may have strayed from the path himself, slipped and fallen. Therefore language can be used to manipulate what you belief and in some ways is used to control you. Newspapers tell you what they withdraw you should know not what you would like to know. An example of this was in the Daily Mirror 13th January 1996 page 7. A heading and its article entitle â€Å"Gulp!\r\n” took up nearly the whole of the page compared with a little boxwood in the left hand break which had the heading â€Å"Girls-raped by gang of 14. ” When a few years later a similar thing happens to a boy this gets front-page news with the title of â€Å"A audacious gang rapes boy, 19” from The Sun. The way these articles have been pos itioned and the amount they have had written on them manipulates what the mass media wants us to know. The way the assist article is written shows us that the media try to control what we think.\r\nThe heading itself creates a make out of emotions even though his age is disposed(p) as nineteen, the word ‘boy’ is what in a flash grabs your attention and causes your imagination to see a small child rather than a young man. Therefore taking in to consideration all these examples you find that language is not only a loaded weapon but is also â€Å"one thousand ways biased. ” It can be used to manipulate what we think and what we think we know. We are told what to think and not asked to think about what we are told.\r\n'